Alan,

Thanks. Makes much more sense now. If you had been referring to the first article I found, I was going to have to check every last thing I’d written before I wrecked myself with an unbeknownst disruptive voice. [edit]

Also, I used “dissonant” when I meant “disruptive” earlier. The intro to this article was disruptive, but the ending sounded perfectly reasonable to me.

Thanks,
Adam