I think one issue might be how we interpret mission command. ADRP 6-0 does provides the definition, outlines the six principles, and describes mission command as a philosophy and as a war fighting function. Yet, if you asked leaders to explain mission command, you will probably receive a variety of answers. From discussions I have had, I think (generally) that people interpret mission command as empowerment (transformative-type leadership) and direct command or control as more “direct leadership” or at the most extreme, micromanagement. I’m not sure if that is right or wrong, but I would say the answer is probably a bit more complex. If mission command is the art of command and the science of control, then the two should not be mutually exclusive. Alan’s example of a combined arms breach is a really good example. This type of mission requires extensive planning and coordination. As higher headquarters pass down the mission to the level of execution, the degree of flexibility becomes more restrictive. The battalion plan may require or allow a company commander to implement, or refine, control measures through mission command, but the platoon leaders and squad leaders are probably executing a fairly controlled mission. That doesn’t mean that the company commander is micromanaging or controlling every move and decision, the mission may just require a narrow left and right limit for subordinate leaders. Now, once the unit completes that task and transitions to stability operations, or the situation becomes more ambiguous, the need for small unit leaders to exercise more disciplined initiative may increase. I do believe the most successful units are those that emphasize the principles of mission command during home station training and when they are building their teams for deployment, CTC rotations, etc.

Another piece recently published in the blog From The Green Notebook by Regina Parker (https://fromthegreennotebook.com/2017/02/02/time-to-change-mission-command-doctrine/) highlights the complexities of doctrinally defining mission command. Although I am not ready to agree that we should change our doctrine, the article does bring up some interesting points. Her conclusion also provides some well-known examples of how we may not practice the principles of mission command as much as we think. Although different from Alan’s tactical example, it adds to the overall discussion of mission command.

Alan, great job on the article!